What meaning, “Main Parade Ground”?

What meaning do we attach to the Presidio’s Main Parade Ground?  For many of us, perhaps it has just been a large, empty, asphalt parking lot. More recently, the parking lot has been filled with commuters using the shuttle for downtown and places beyond.  

But is that all there is? Do we just move ahead and build new things on it? Like an art museum? Do we “green” it, so we can play on it and look out on the Bay? Perhaps. Or, do we consider what this parade ground means and what it can teach us, if we stop to understand what a parade ground means to others.

None of us wants war, and those who have served know this better than anyone. Nor should war be glorified or celebrated. It is a last resort. But we can honor those who have served and who continue to serve. We can consider, for a moment, the meaning and importance of our own Main Parade Ground in the context of service to the country. We can consider that service and what we want the Presidio to be, before we change the context of the place because of an irrelevant “unanticipated opportunity.”

Joseph Galloway writes for the McClatchy Newspapers.  He was a combat correspondent during the Vietnam War and is the co-author of “We Were Soldiers Once…and Young.”  This is the story of the first large-scale ground battle of the Vietnam War.  Perhaps, you’ve seen the movie of the same name?  He writes the following commentary regarding the dedication of a new parade ground at Fort Benning, Georgia.

Commentary: A great day for the U.S. Army

By Joe Galloway | McClatchy Newspapers

FORT BENNING, Ga. — It was a great day for the infantry and for the U.S. Army, and it was one for the history books, as well.

On a bright, sunny spring day in Georgia, Fort Benning and the National Infantry Museum dedicated a new parade ground, and the first of what will be thousands of basic training companies broke it in by marching in review for their graduation.

Before the 125 newest soldiers in the Army set boots on that field, though, it was consecrated in a ceremony that saw veterans and descendants of veterans of eight of America’s wars spread soil collected from their battlefields on the new parade ground.

Douglas Hamilton, a fifth generation descendant of Alexander Hamilton, sprinkled soil gathered from the decisive battlefield of Yorktown in the Revolutionary War.

Former Sen. Dirk Kempthorne, a great-grandson of Pvt. Charles Kempthorne of the Union Army’s 3rd Wisconsin Infantry, and Henry B. Pease Jr., a descendant of Henry Lewis Benning, the Confederate commander at the Burnside Bridge, spread soil from the blood-soaked Civil War battlefield of Antietam, or Sharpsburg, as Gen. Benning probably called it.

Soil from World War I battlefields in France was spread on the parade ground by George York, son of the legendary Sgt. Alvin York, and Samuel Parker Moss, grandson of Samuel Parker of the 28th Infantry. Both York and Parker earned the Medal of Honor during World War I.

World War II was represented by soil collected from the beaches at Normandy and those of Corregidor and Guadalcanal in the Pacific. Theodore Roosevelt IV, grandson of Theodore Roosevelt Jr., who earned the Medal of Honor on D-Day at Normandy, and by Kirk Davis, son of Charles Davis, who earned the Medal of Honor at Guadalcanal, spread soil from those battlefields.

Two legendary warriors from the Korean War — Col. Ola Lee Mize, who held Outpost Harry against overwhelming odds and earned a Medal of Honor, and Gen. Sun Yup Paik, who at age 30 commanded both a division and a corps in the South Korean Army — sprinkled soil from their war’s battlefields.

Then it was time to honor the infantrymen who fought in Vietnam, and two legendary old soldiers marched onto the field wearing their black cavalry Stetsons. Lt. Gen. (ret.) Hal Moore and Command Sergeant Major (ret.) Basil Plumley carried jars bearing soil collected at Landing Zone X-Ray in the Ia Drang Valley and on other Vietnam battlefields.

In the stands, a dozen or more Ia Drang veterans and other 1st Cavalry Division (Airmobile) veterans, most wearing the same black hats, stood at attention as Moore, 87, and Plumley, 89, carried out their mission and then saluted them.

Command Sergeant Major Marvin Hill, the senior enlisted adviser to Gen. David Petraeus at the U.S. Central Command in Tampa, spread soil collected from battlefields in Kuwait, Iraq and Afghanistan during Operation Desert Storm and Operations Iraqi Freedom and Enduring Freedom.

Actor Sam Elliott, who portrayed Sgt. Maj. Plumley in the movie “We Were Soldiers,” narrated the ceremony. (Full disclosure: The movie is based on a book that Gen. Moore and I wrote.)

The program began and ended with some spectacular flying demonstrations using helicopters of the Vietnam War era, and Fort Benning once more heard distant echoes of the blades of Hueys, OH-6s and Cobra gunships.

This week’s ceremony marked a partial opening of the new $100 million National Infantry Museum that adjoins the parade ground. The grand opening of the entire facility is scheduled for June 19. Fort Benning’s hometown, Columbus, Georgia, provided more than 200 acres of land at the gates of the fort for construction of the Infantry Museum, and Columbus citizens, foundations and companies donated almost half the money needed to build it.

The Infantry Museum Foundation is busy rounding up the last $10 million to complete work on the displays that will fill the museum’s galleries on America’s wars and the infantry battles that distinguished them.

The new soldiers graduating from basic training with Bravo Company, 1st Battalion, 50th Infantry marched past the stands, which were filled not only with their proud parents and siblings, but also with the assembled VIPs and such legendary infantrymen as Gen. (ret.) David Grange and Gen. (ret.) Ed Burba and Col. (ret.) Ralph Puckett.

In the infantry and in the Army, there are good days and bad days, and a few great days. This was one of the great days.

Yes, the Army made the site into a parking lot. Yes, the Army wasn’t always smart about what they did, like disposing of waste improperly at the Presidio. But before we are hurried into constructing a new irrelevant use at the Presidio, such as an art museum at the head of the historic Main Parade Ground, we must consider what greater purpose this ground means for us and what we can learn from history and about what kind of people we want to be.

I’m not for celebrating war. I’m for honoring service and for seeing that the thread running through the history of the Presidio, service, is preserved and continued.

–Doug Kern

Presidio Historical Association Press Release

News Release - FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

December 8, 2008

For more information, contact:
Gary Widman, 415/435-0360, gwidman@mindspring.com
Whitney Hall 707/778-6975, whithall@comcast.net
www.presidioassociation.org // www.savepresidio.blogspot.com

Public Angered by Revised Presidio Museum Scheme as Dec. 9 Public Meeting Nears

San Francisco…Public groups that strongly condemned the Presidio Trust’s first attempt to take over the Presidio of San Francisco’s Main Post Historic District for a massive contemporary art museum, upscale hotel and multiplex theater are disappointed and angered by the Trust’s newest proposal.

That new proposal for an art museum sponsored by Gap founder Donald Fisher, was disclosed last Friday, following the preceding week’s disclosure of three new alternate proposals, apparently now abandoned.

The Trust conceded that its original proposal — which it had advocated for more than a year — would not meet regulatory requirements. But the Trust’s newest proposal would still place a huge contemporary art museum at the center and top of the historic parade ground on the Presidio’s Main Post and leave the Trust’s massive, upscale hotel and movie theater plans largely unchanged.

Gary Widman, President of the Presidio Historical Association, said that, “The new proposal has almost the same problems as the old. It is unlikely to meet standards for National Historic Landmarks for many of the same reasons that disqualified the first plan. It also fails to meet the public’s most significant and repeatedly stated concerns — the Trust’s failure to safeguard or support the National Park and Historic District entrusted to it, failure to meet requirements of law that the size of new buildings be controlled by the dimensions of buildings removed, and failure to observe realistic traffic and vehicle limitations by placing facilities that will attract over 500,000 additional new visitors a year into an area with very limited parking and street access in the Presidio and in nearby neighborhoods.

“The Presidio’s Main Post is already expected to have an additional 300,000 to 400,000 visitors per year to its new Disney Museum. But it is most upsetting that art museum sponsor Don Fisher and the Trust think that the public can be easily manipulated by publicity and so-called “new” plans that continue to ignore the problems of the old plans.

Critics of the controversial new proposal to build the Fisher contemporary art museum objected to misleading statements appearing in local media that the redesigned museum is “downsized” when it appears to be 5,000 sq. ft. larger than the original proposal.

“Why the Trust and Mr. Fisher want to pursue building these massive, invasive structures which are so strenuously opposed in the Main Post, when they could be built elsewhere with praise rather than condemnation, escapes us. The near-unanimous public opposition is not going away, and each week’s new Trust proposals appear designed to stimulate public confusion and years of new litigation,” Widman said.

The Presidio of San Francisco, a National Park with its 230-year old fort site previously governed by Spain and Mexico, was called the” Plymouth Rock of the West” by California’s State Historic Preservation Office.

Widman adds that the Trust’s last-minute design changes to the Fisher art museum announced Friday afternoon have created confusion and anger among opponents who have spent hundreds of hours studying and preparing comments on the Trust’s 332-page Draft Supplemental Impact Statement (DSEIS) issued last June.

The Trust’s public comment meeting, now open to comments both on the old and the new proposals, will be held TOMORROW, Tuesday, Dec. 9th at 6:30 pm at San Francisco’s Palace of Fine Arts.

David Bancroft, a founder of SaveThePresidio.org, called the Trust’s new plans “a complete disappointment,” adding that, ” We will still have a huge contemporary art museum and large hotel smack dab in the middle of the historic Main Post, top center, overlooking the entire Main Parade Ground. This is progress? A National Historic Landmark District should not be made into a suburban mall or a culture quad.”

Lori Brooke, President of San Francisco’s Cow Hollow Association added, “The Trust’s new plans do nothing to answer our major concerns that the museum is at odds with the integrity of a unique historic setting and will seriously damage the heart of this National Park. The significant increase in visitors without adequate public transit will create traffic, parking, congestion, noise and pollution problems, damaging the setting as a National Park.”

Boyd de Larios, representing Descendants of Anza & Portolá Expeditions, said of the Trust’s latest proposal, “This is still an attempt to hijack a National Park, just repackaged and with a new spin. Who will tell the next gazillionaire that he can’t house his Rembrandt collection or baseball cards at the Presidio? The Presidio is a National Park because of its natural beauty and historic significance. The Presidio Trust should be focused on preserving our western American heritage, not unrelated eclectic development.”

###

TO MEDIA: The Presidio Historical Association will hold a press conference at the entrance to the Palace of Fine Arts, 3301 Lyon St., San Francisco, CA 94123 from 5:15 pm - 6 pm immediately before the Trust’s Public Comment on Tuesday, Dec. 9. For more information, call Terry at 415/686-8442
—–
Founded in the 1950s, the nonprofit Presidio Historical Association (PHA) has worked in cooperation with the National Park Service and Presidio Trust since 1994 to advocate for preserving the integrity of the Presidio?s National Historic Landmark District, located within the Golden Gate National Recreation Area (GGNRA). PHA created a museum for the Army when it was based at the Presidio. Earlier, PHA helped restore historic Fort Point at the base of the Golden Gate Bridge.

‘Tis But A Scratch

It’s “just a flesh wound.”  

The black knight guards a tiny bridge for unknown reasons. Although supremely skilled in swordplay, he suffers from unchecked overconfidence and a staunch refusal to ever give up. 

–Wikipedia  

Life imitates art at the proposed Presidio contemporary art museum project.

–Doug Kern

RAP4 Comment Period Extended to Jan. 17, 2009

The comment period for Remedial Action Plan #4 (RAP4) on Landfills 8 and 10 has been extended to January 17, 2009.

–Doug Kern

Main Post Update

Time to pull our hair out.

The “newest” proposal for the contemporary art museum at the Presidio takes the previous profoundly objectionable idea for a modern structure at the head of the Main Post Parade Ground in the middle of a National Historic Landmark District, increases the size by 40% to 140,000 square feet, moves it across the street, demolishes the bowling alley and other existing structures, and continues to have nothing to do with the Presidio’s natural environment and cultural heritage. Are we happy now?

The Presidio Trust has some new ideas for the Main Post.

Thoughtful analysis provided.

–Doug Kern

Fisher Museum Proposal Deficient

Last night the Presidio Trust held a meeting to discuss interim results of their Section 106 process regarding the proposed Main Post contemporary art museum, lodge and theater addition.

In an interesting “cooking channel” overhead video-style presentation, a Trust representative effectively demonstrated how the proposed museum at the head of the Main Post did not meet the Secretary of the Interior’s standards for rehabilitating historic buildings. Even though the Trust selected only 5 of the 10 Secretary’s standards as being applicable to their Main Post rehabilitation project, it was an important initial public discussion of how the Secretary of the Interior’s standards were relevant and applicable to the Presidio, a national park and National Historic Landmark District. Many audience members expressed their appreciation to the Trust for the presentation.

Trust representatives were unapologetic, however, about the time, money and effort spent on promoting the proposed action. Representatives went on the say that no one should have interpreted that the proposed Fisher museum was actually the Trust’s preferred action.

The Trust did not explain their decision to choose rehabilitation as a treatment approach for historic buildings, given that the National Park Service has defined four different possible approaches: preservation, rehabilitation, restoration and reconstruction. A careful read of these approaches suggests that large scale new construction is not the intent of the Secretary’s standards for the treatment of historic buildings. Instead, the standards do seem to contemplate “related new construction” that “will not destroy historic materials, features, and spatial relationships that characterize the property.”

There are also extensive Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Archeological and Historic Preservation. These standards, while relevant to the Presidio and the Main Post, were not discussed at the meeting.

–Doug Kern

Main Post Public Meeting Postponed

The Presidio Trust Public Board of Directors Meeting regarding the Main Post SEIS has been postponed until Tuesday, December 9th, 2008.  The meeting will be held at 6:30 pm at the Herbst International Exhibition Hall at the Presidio. Public comment period extended until….

–Doug Kern

Landfill 8, Landfill 10: Cleanup Decision Document to be Released

On November 17, 2008 the Presidio Trust will release a decision document to remediate Landfills 8 and 10 on the Presidio of San Francisco. The Trust does not propose to remove either of these landfills, but to contain the waste in place.

We’ve talked about the historic importance of Landfill 8 previously, noting that the landfill covers an historic Merchant Marine cemetery with 30,000 cubic yards of contaminated waste. Read this paper by the Trust on the cemetery’s history.

The Trust will propose to cover the landfill and buried cemetery with an additional 3 to 5 feet of sand at a cost of about $1,000,000. The landfill waste materials contain pesticides, PAHs, and metals such as lead, cadmium and zinc.

For a national park the more appropriate remedy is to remove the waste material as has been done at many other Presidio sites. The cost will be more expensive, about $5,000,000, but the solution will be permanent and we will not burden future generations with contamination in the park.

At Landfill 10, the site will remain a parking lot for the Public Health Service Hospital. The slope of the landfill to the west will be exposed waste material and will be covered only with vegetation. While the contaminant levels appear to be low in the landfill material, there is a chance that contamination will be exposed when the slope is cut back for seismic stability purposes.

A public comment period is scheduled to begin on November 17 and run through December 22, 2008. I recommend that interested members of the public request the decision documents from the Presidio Trust when they are released on November 17. If you need additional time to review the materials request a time extension from the Department of Toxic Substances Control and the Presidio Trust. According to a Presidio electronic newsletter article released on Tuesday November 4, 2008:

  • The documents will be available in the Presidio Trust Library, 34 Graham Street. 
  • They will also be available on the website. 
  • Send written comments to: Bob Boggs, DTSC, 700 Heinz Avenue, Suite 200, Berkeley, CA 94710-2721 (email: rboggs@dtsc.ca.gov); 
  • OR Eileen Fanelli, Presidio Trust, P.O. Box 29052, 34 Graham Street, San Francisco, CA  94129. 
  • A public meeting on Draft Remedial Action Plan will be held on Tuesday, December 9, (meeting moved up, due to conflict with Main Post meeting on December 9th) Tuesday, December 2nd, 6 pm, Presidio Officers’ Club, 50 Moraga Avenue. If you have questions, call (415) 561-5418.

More on the subject of Landfills 8 and 10 in the coming days.

–Doug Kern

Vote Today

Election Day!

I voted last week by mail-in ballot and phoned the department of elections

today. Yes, my vote has been counted. 

Fingers are crossed and will follow the results closely all day.

–Doug Kern

 

Trust Board Meeting Announced

The Presidio Trust has announced the time and place of their next public board meeting to review the Main Post DSEIS.

Presidio Trust Public Board of Directors Meeting
Thursday, November 13, 6:30 pm
St. Mary’s Conference Center, 1111 Gough Street, San Francisco

St. Mary’s is at the corner of Geary and Gough streets.

–Doug Kern