http://thedailykernel.com/2008/05/09/45-days-to-comment-on-the-presidios-future/#utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=45-days-to-comment-on-the-presidios-future Cleanup, Remediation and Restoration at the Presidio of San Francisco Sun, 17 Apr 2011 16:18:45 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 http://thedailykernel.com/2008/05/09/45-days-to-comment-on-the-presidios-future/comment-page-1/#comment-39 Anonymous Sat, 24 May 2008 21:09:45 +0000 http://thedailykernel.com/?p=64#comment-39 Where is the future? Where is the future?

]]> http://thedailykernel.com/2008/05/09/45-days-to-comment-on-the-presidios-future/comment-page-1/#comment-23 GreenFairy Sat, 10 May 2008 02:41:01 +0000 http://thedailykernel.com/?p=64#comment-23 I think the PR department basically runs the Trust, it's almost like they don't let any other staff in public without an escort. They will not change on their own. I think the PR department basically runs the Trust, it’s almost like they don’t let any other staff in public without an escort.
They will not change on their own.

]]> http://thedailykernel.com/2008/05/09/45-days-to-comment-on-the-presidios-future/comment-page-1/#comment-22 Jay Bird Fri, 09 May 2008 19:50:47 +0000 http://thedailykernel.com/?p=64#comment-22 The 45 day public comment period on something as complex as the pending new development of hundeds of thousands of square feet in the heart of the National Historic Landmark District strikes me as "typical" of the Trust's inability to interact with the public in an open and inclusive way. I consider the Presidio OUR National Park but the Trust behaves as if the Presidio is THEIR exclusive National Corporation Business Park. If anyone at the Trust is reading this, my advice would be to take a very hard look at your PR department and evaluate how (easily) you could change your stance with the public from combative to collaborative. (Hint - install as a permanent and meaningful fixture a replica of the PHSH Community Work Group) The 45 day public comment period on something as complex as the pending new development of hundeds of thousands of square feet in the heart of the National Historic Landmark District strikes me as “typical” of the Trust’s inability to interact with the public in an open and inclusive way. I consider the Presidio OUR National Park but the Trust behaves as if the Presidio is THEIR exclusive National Corporation Business Park. If anyone at the Trust is reading this, my advice would be to take a very hard look at your PR department and evaluate how (easily) you could change your stance with the public from combative to collaborative. (Hint – install as a permanent and meaningful fixture a replica of the PHSH Community Work Group)

]]>