<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Matier and Ross: In the Park</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thedailykernel.com/2008/07/16/matier-and-ross-in-the-park/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thedailykernel.com/2008/07/16/matier-and-ross-in-the-park/#utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=matier-and-ross-in-the-park</link>
	<description>Cleanup, Remediation and Restoration at the Presidio of San Francisco</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 17 Apr 2011 16:18:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Bird</title>
		<link>http://thedailykernel.com/2008/07/16/matier-and-ross-in-the-park/comment-page-1/#comment-80</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Bird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 00:27:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedailykernel.com/?p=97#comment-80</guid>
		<description>The community is entitled to ask theTrust Board how their proposed actions respect and adhere to the intent of the Presidio Trust Act Section 101 Findings  and especially Finding (5) which reads, &quot;as part of the Golden Gate National Recreation Area, the Presido&#039;s significant natural, historic, scenic, cultural and recreational resources must be managed in a manner which is consistent with sound principles of land use planning and managemnt, and WHICH PROTECTS THE PRESIDIO FROM DEVELOPMENT AND USES WHICH WOULD DESTROY THE SCENIC BEAUTY AND HISTORIC AND NATURAL CHARACTER OF THE AREA AND CULTURAL AND RECREATIONAL RESOURCES. (CAPS added for emphasis) I would be quite interested in individual answers from the Trust Board Members...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The community is entitled to ask theTrust Board how their proposed actions respect and adhere to the intent of the Presidio Trust Act Section 101 Findings  and especially Finding (5) which reads, &#8220;as part of the Golden Gate National Recreation Area, the Presido&#8217;s significant natural, historic, scenic, cultural and recreational resources must be managed in a manner which is consistent with sound principles of land use planning and managemnt, and WHICH PROTECTS THE PRESIDIO FROM DEVELOPMENT AND USES WHICH WOULD DESTROY THE SCENIC BEAUTY AND HISTORIC AND NATURAL CHARACTER OF THE AREA AND CULTURAL AND RECREATIONAL RESOURCES. (CAPS added for emphasis) I would be quite interested in individual answers from the Trust Board Members&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

