'Remediation'

Marine Hospital Cemetery Underneath Landfill 8

Back in 1994 I commented on the Army’s Record of Decision for the Public Health Service Hospital (PHSH) which included Landfill 8, a 2.6 acre deposit of rubble and debris up to 15 feet deep, located just to the north and behind the PHSH. I was deeply concerned that this landfill was placed over an old neglected merchant marine cemetery. The poor treatment of this forgotten cemetery was not appropriate within a national park. Something more needed to happen.

The years went by.  Priorities came and went.  The cemetery remained, buried under waste.

Periodically, the Presidio Restoration Advisory Board (RAB) would comment on the subject. In 1997 the RAB developed a set of Landfill Closure Principles and passed a Landfill Resolution.

As recently as 2006, the RAB submitted this comment to the Presidio Trust regarding Landfill 8.

We believe that the Presidio is better served in the long run by excavating a portion of the waste that currently covers the cemetery, without disturbing the remains.  We believe that the extra costs associated with this remedy are small compared with the benefits of additional waste removal.  The additional 3 feet of debris and waste removed from over top of the cemetery in Alternative 5A more appropriately addresses a permanent and respectful treatment of the cemetery, while at the same time, leaves space for the proposed sand cover material, so that a 5 foot mound is not created as we visualize would occur in remedy 5B. 

Now, due to the development at the PHSH, the site remedy has been moved to the front burner. The team is working on a final remedy for this site. There are metals, pesticides and other contaminants at or near the surface of the landfill. The Presidio Trust favors covering the area with three to five feet of sand, restoring native dune habitat and creating a memorial for the Marine Hospital Cemetery.  This remedy would protect human health and the environment by covering up the area. It would also not disturb any human remains.

While I think this would work, we still haven’t fully vetted this situation. There are a large number of bodies (between 500 and 600) buried at this site. The interred are from many countries.  A large effort has been made by the Presidio Trust to understand the origin of the remains and a site history compilation is contained in this thoughtful report.  Here is a very brief excerpt on the nationalities of those interred at the site.

The sailors buried in the Hospital Cemetery hailed from ports all over the world. The list in Appendix D represents 30 of the United States and 43 countries. After American sailors, most came from Sweden, followed by Norway, Finland, Germany and Ireland. Some even came from such exotic locales as Tahiti and the Cape Verde Islands. It is quite possible that these foreign sailors ended up in the Hospital Cemetery because they were unable to communicate information regarding family or friends to their doctors.

I believe that we must examine this situation more closely prior to implementing a final remedy, which would further bury the site. We need to examine the various laws that are relevant to this complex issue. When that analysis is complete we may then consider whether it is indeed appropriate and necessary to engage in a larger project to carefully restore this piece of Presidio history.  Here is an article originally published in the San Francisco Call on March 29, 1896 that gives a sense of the history we need to preserve.

– Doug Kern

Tags: , , , , ,

PHSH Update

Back in April I noted that the time crunch was on to develop cleanup remedies for the Public Health Service Hospital.  The two landfill remediation projects need to happen so the Presidio Trust can move ahead with development plans.  We’ve worked pretty hard over the last several weeks and the team (Presidio Trust, National Park Service, Department of Toxic Substances Control, San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board, Presidio Restoration Advisory Board) is meeting tomorrow with senior management (from the same agencies) to work over various proposals.  We may be close to a resolution, but I’m sure that many concerns will be raised by all parties before a final proposal moves ahead.

– Doug Kern

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Baker Beach Landslide Update

Received this update from the Presidio Trust Remediation Department regarding the landslide at Baker Beach. The Trust, in coordination with regulatory agencies and the National Park Service, will be making repairs to the slope next week. Progress. This is good news. Beach goers are going to appreciate when the site is eventually opened again to the public.

The short term work to smooth the top of the slide area to prevent toppling failure will occur next Wednesday (May 21st). The work is anticipated to take one day. Equipment will mobilize to site on May 20th. The beach will be cleared and personnel stationed there during the smoothing work to advise beachgoers of the activity, and monitor for safety.

Comments welcomed.

– Doug Kern

Tags: , , ,

Baker Beach Cleanup and Landslide

Late in 2007 thousands of cubic yards of waste from former Army operations were hauled away from two remediation sites, just south of the Golden Gate Bridge. A landslide develops after the cleanup is complete and prevents the reopening of Baker Beach for public use near the area of potential landslide. This video explores the cleanup sites and takes a look at the landslide at the end of April 2008.

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Coyote Gulch Restoration

Today, we visit the Coyote Gulch restoration site in the Presidio of San Francisco. Formerly known as “Baker Beach Disturbed Area 3″ this site contained tens of thousands of cubic yards of waste, filling the ravine to the rim. In 2004, this waste was removed by the Presidio Trust and later replanted and restored by the National Park Service and the Trust. Removing the waste revealed a small creek flowing down to the beach which now supports wetland plants. Insects, birds and mammals have since recolonized the area. And that’s how the restoration cycle works. Coyote Gulch — a great example of what the Presidio of San Francisco can be.

– Doug Kern

Tags: , , , , , , ,

SF Board of Supervisors, Hearing on Mountain Lake Contamination, Concluding Remarks

At the February 25, 2008 San Francisco Board of Supervisors Land Use and Economic Development Committee hearing the Supervisors offer their concluding remarks including Supervisor Alioto-Pier’s desire to convene a meeting of the various parties to resolve the contamination problems at Mountain Lake.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

SF Board of Supervisors, Hearing on Mountain Lake Contamination, Friends of Mountain Lake Park

At the February 25, 2008 San Francisco Board of Supervisors Land Use and Economic Development Committee hearing Friends of Mountain Lake Park President, Kate Scanlon speaks about the value of Mountain Lake to the local community. Rich Shrieve, with Friends of Mountain Lake Park since 1980 talks about human impacts to the lake and his frustration with potential legal action among the agencies.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

SF Board of Supervisors, Hearing on Mountain Lake Contamination, Craig Middleton Comments

At the February 25, 2008 San Francisco Board of Supervisors Land Use and Economic Development Committee hearing Presidio Trust Executive Director Craig Middleton confirms that Mountain Lake does need to be cleaned up and that stormwater does need to be diverted away from the lake.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

SF Board of Supervisors, Hearing on Mountain Lake Contamination, Caltrans Questions and Answers

At the February 25, 2008 San Francisco Board of Supervisors Land Use and Economic Development Committee hearing Caltrans spokesperson, Dan McElhaney, answers that Caltrans will share in the responsibility for cleaning up Mountain Lake at the Presidio of San Francisco. But does he commit his agency to any action other than meeting with other parties? Does the stalemate continue? You be the judge.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

SF Board of Supervisors, Hearing on Mountain Lake Contamination, Caltrans Prepared Comments

At the February 25, 2008 San Francisco Board of Supervisors Land Use and Economic Development Committee hearing Caltrans spokesperson, Dan McElhaney, discusses how Caltrans wants to be a good neighbor and share in the responsibility for Mountain Lake at the Presidio of San Francisco. He makes a claim (at about 2:40 into the video) that Caltrans’ portion of the runoff into Mountain Lake is only about 5% of the total. Highway 1 outlets drain stormwater from the roadway directly into Mountain Lake. Lake sediment testing shows high levels of lead near these stormdrains.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,