'dogs'

Double Standard?

A San Francisco Chronicle article shouts today, 

Hunters Shoot Aggressive Coyotes In Presidio. 

Disappointing article. Over-reaches. Exaggerates. Fear. Hype. Typical.

One person sent to kill one coyote. I doubt it was much of a “hunt.” They knew where it was. I’m sure the officials who called for the coyote’s destruction viewed it as a measure of last resort rather than “dispatching a sharpshooter.” Sheesh.

The Presidio and other lands of the GGNRA are special places. We work hard to keep open space and wildlife in the Bay Area. Open space adds to our quality of life. I have seen many coyotes in the City and around the Presidio and they run away from me. It’s a special (and usually quite brief) pleasure to watch them. We must continue to educate people not to feed or attract coyotes by leaving pet food outside for their own pets or by actually intentionally feeding the animals. No one wants a pet or child injured. Perhaps our pet and wildlife education efforts need to be stronger.

On the other hand some owners of domesticated pets seem to operate with a different standard. We don’t seem quite so alarmed when domesticated dogs charge people or wildlife. 

I’ve seen dog-owners revel in their pooch running through flocks of birds and chasing them at the beach. Maybe it seems like good and appropriate “dog fun.” They’re entitled, after all. The dogs love to run and chase birds. It’s what they do. The owners probably did not realize these birds were resting during a long migration.

I’ve been mobbed and jumped on by a pack of dogs being walked by a “professional” at the Presidio while I was just walking on a trail. No apologies given. The dogs have the right-of-way when they’re in an 8-pack. 

I’ve also been charged and bitten by a dog on the Presidio. My clothing was torn and the skin heavily bruised in an unprovoked charge from over 50 yards by an unleashed dog. No apologies from the owner. Just a hasty exit with the dog.

After reporting the incident to Park Police the aggressive dog was not shot and destroyed for its actions. The owner was not punished.

Double standard?

Tags: , ,

Didn’t Get the Memo?

This observation from TDK reader MZ on the Batteries to Bluffs Trail.  [added emphasis is mine. -dk]

During the course of bird surveying this Saturday in the Presidio I came upon a person with a leashed dog on the Batteries to Bluffs trail.  Being that this trail is one on which dog walking is not allowed, I approached the individual to inform him of this fact. Much to my surprise, I recognized the dogs handler as an off duty employee of the US Park Police, stationed at the Presidio.  I know this individual to be a very conscientious and dedicated employee and one who would never knowingly violate any of the Parks rules.  After a greeting and some discussion, I learned that this Presidio law enforcement officer was not aware that the Batteries to Bluffs trail is off limits to dogs.  

This indicates to me that the trailside signage is inadequate, as is GGNRA interagency communication. If the employees of the GGNRA and the other federal agencies working within the GGNRA are not aware of the laws pertaining to pets in the park, how in the world can we expect the general public to know and abide by the rules?

This is yet another indicator that the outreach, education and enforcement efforts regarding pets in the Park are too soft and, consequently, are not as effective as they need to be.

Your thoughts?

– Doug Kern

Tags: , , , , ,