'Don Fisher'

Presidio Historical Association Press Release

News Release - FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

December 8, 2008

For more information, contact:
Gary Widman, 415/435-0360, gwidman@mindspring.com
Whitney Hall 707/778-6975, whithall@comcast.net
www.presidioassociation.org // www.savepresidio.blogspot.com

Public Angered by Revised Presidio Museum Scheme as Dec. 9 Public Meeting Nears

San Francisco…Public groups that strongly condemned the Presidio Trust’s first attempt to take over the Presidio of San Francisco’s Main Post Historic District for a massive contemporary art museum, upscale hotel and multiplex theater are disappointed and angered by the Trust’s newest proposal.

That new proposal for an art museum sponsored by Gap founder Donald Fisher, was disclosed last Friday, following the preceding week’s disclosure of three new alternate proposals, apparently now abandoned.

The Trust conceded that its original proposal — which it had advocated for more than a year — would not meet regulatory requirements. But the Trust’s newest proposal would still place a huge contemporary art museum at the center and top of the historic parade ground on the Presidio’s Main Post and leave the Trust’s massive, upscale hotel and movie theater plans largely unchanged.

Gary Widman, President of the Presidio Historical Association, said that, “The new proposal has almost the same problems as the old. It is unlikely to meet standards for National Historic Landmarks for many of the same reasons that disqualified the first plan. It also fails to meet the public’s most significant and repeatedly stated concerns — the Trust’s failure to safeguard or support the National Park and Historic District entrusted to it, failure to meet requirements of law that the size of new buildings be controlled by the dimensions of buildings removed, and failure to observe realistic traffic and vehicle limitations by placing facilities that will attract over 500,000 additional new visitors a year into an area with very limited parking and street access in the Presidio and in nearby neighborhoods.

“The Presidio’s Main Post is already expected to have an additional 300,000 to 400,000 visitors per year to its new Disney Museum. But it is most upsetting that art museum sponsor Don Fisher and the Trust think that the public can be easily manipulated by publicity and so-called “new” plans that continue to ignore the problems of the old plans.

Critics of the controversial new proposal to build the Fisher contemporary art museum objected to misleading statements appearing in local media that the redesigned museum is “downsized” when it appears to be 5,000 sq. ft. larger than the original proposal.

“Why the Trust and Mr. Fisher want to pursue building these massive, invasive structures which are so strenuously opposed in the Main Post, when they could be built elsewhere with praise rather than condemnation, escapes us. The near-unanimous public opposition is not going away, and each week’s new Trust proposals appear designed to stimulate public confusion and years of new litigation,” Widman said.

The Presidio of San Francisco, a National Park with its 230-year old fort site previously governed by Spain and Mexico, was called the” Plymouth Rock of the West” by California’s State Historic Preservation Office.

Widman adds that the Trust’s last-minute design changes to the Fisher art museum announced Friday afternoon have created confusion and anger among opponents who have spent hundreds of hours studying and preparing comments on the Trust’s 332-page Draft Supplemental Impact Statement (DSEIS) issued last June.

The Trust’s public comment meeting, now open to comments both on the old and the new proposals, will be held TOMORROW, Tuesday, Dec. 9th at 6:30 pm at San Francisco’s Palace of Fine Arts.

David Bancroft, a founder of SaveThePresidio.org, called the Trust’s new plans “a complete disappointment,” adding that, ” We will still have a huge contemporary art museum and large hotel smack dab in the middle of the historic Main Post, top center, overlooking the entire Main Parade Ground. This is progress? A National Historic Landmark District should not be made into a suburban mall or a culture quad.”

Lori Brooke, President of San Francisco’s Cow Hollow Association added, “The Trust’s new plans do nothing to answer our major concerns that the museum is at odds with the integrity of a unique historic setting and will seriously damage the heart of this National Park. The significant increase in visitors without adequate public transit will create traffic, parking, congestion, noise and pollution problems, damaging the setting as a National Park.”

Boyd de Larios, representing Descendants of Anza & Portolá Expeditions, said of the Trust’s latest proposal, “This is still an attempt to hijack a National Park, just repackaged and with a new spin. Who will tell the next gazillionaire that he can’t house his Rembrandt collection or baseball cards at the Presidio? The Presidio is a National Park because of its natural beauty and historic significance. The Presidio Trust should be focused on preserving our western American heritage, not unrelated eclectic development.”

###

TO MEDIA: The Presidio Historical Association will hold a press conference at the entrance to the Palace of Fine Arts, 3301 Lyon St., San Francisco, CA 94123 from 5:15 pm - 6 pm immediately before the Trust’s Public Comment on Tuesday, Dec. 9. For more information, call Terry at 415/686-8442
—–
Founded in the 1950s, the nonprofit Presidio Historical Association (PHA) has worked in cooperation with the National Park Service and Presidio Trust since 1994 to advocate for preserving the integrity of the Presidio?s National Historic Landmark District, located within the Golden Gate National Recreation Area (GGNRA). PHA created a museum for the Army when it was based at the Presidio. Earlier, PHA helped restore historic Fort Point at the base of the Golden Gate Bridge.

Tags: , , , , , , ,

‘Tis But A Scratch

It’s “just a flesh wound.”  

The black knight guards a tiny bridge for unknown reasons. Although supremely skilled in swordplay, he suffers from unchecked overconfidence and a staunch refusal to ever give up. 

–Wikipedia  

Life imitates art at the proposed Presidio contemporary art museum project.

–Doug Kern

Tags: , , ,

Main Post Update

Time to pull our hair out.

The “newest” proposal for the contemporary art museum at the Presidio takes the previous profoundly objectionable idea for a modern structure at the head of the Main Post Parade Ground in the middle of a National Historic Landmark District, increases the size by 40% to 140,000 square feet, moves it across the street, demolishes the bowling alley and other existing structures, and continues to have nothing to do with the Presidio’s natural environment and cultural heritage. Are we happy now?

The Presidio Trust has some new ideas for the Main Post.

Thoughtful analysis provided.

–Doug Kern

Tags: , , ,

Fisher Museum Proposal Deficient

Last night the Presidio Trust held a meeting to discuss interim results of their Section 106 process regarding the proposed Main Post contemporary art museum, lodge and theater addition.

In an interesting “cooking channel” overhead video-style presentation, a Trust representative effectively demonstrated how the proposed museum at the head of the Main Post did not meet the Secretary of the Interior’s standards for rehabilitating historic buildings. Even though the Trust selected only 5 of the 10 Secretary’s standards as being applicable to their Main Post rehabilitation project, it was an important initial public discussion of how the Secretary of the Interior’s standards were relevant and applicable to the Presidio, a national park and National Historic Landmark District. Many audience members expressed their appreciation to the Trust for the presentation.

Trust representatives were unapologetic, however, about the time, money and effort spent on promoting the proposed action. Representatives went on the say that no one should have interpreted that the proposed Fisher museum was actually the Trust’s preferred action.

The Trust did not explain their decision to choose rehabilitation as a treatment approach for historic buildings, given that the National Park Service has defined four different possible approaches: preservation, rehabilitation, restoration and reconstruction. A careful read of these approaches suggests that large scale new construction is not the intent of the Secretary’s standards for the treatment of historic buildings. Instead, the standards do seem to contemplate “related new construction” that “will not destroy historic materials, features, and spatial relationships that characterize the property.”

There are also extensive Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Archeological and Historic Preservation. These standards, while relevant to the Presidio and the Main Post, were not discussed at the meeting.

–Doug Kern

Tags: , , , , , ,

Presidio in the LA Times

This September 9th article from the Los Angeles Times explores the ongoing Main Post controversy. (h/t to TDK Reader KW)

The Fishers have made it clear that they want their building to sit on the promontory at the top of the parade ground, and those familiar with the negotiations said there is a chance that if the museum’s site, size and design are not approved, the Fishers would retract their offer.

Wow. 

Just the site, size and design? Is that all?

“Their” building?

–Doug Kern

Tags: , , , ,

Matier and Ross: In the Park

From today’s Matier and Ross, this on the Presidio Trust’s Main Post SEIS meeting on Monday. (h/t to TDK Reader MY.)

Hundreds of people were turned away from Monday night’s packed, six-hour Presidio Trust hearing over Gap founder Don Fisher’s proposal for a contemporary art museum on the old Army base’s parade grounds.

There was no shortage of political orchestrating leading up to the big meeting, on both sides.

For weeks, Mayor Gavin Newsom’s chief political consultant, Eric Jaye, and community organizer Alex Tourk had been working for Fisher to drum up a big turnout of fans of his proposal.

Calls and letters went out to scores of nonprofits and community groups that have benefited from Fisher’s philanthropy, including the San Francisco Boys and Girls clubs, the African American Democratic Club and Friends of the Urban Forest.

On the flip side, foes led by the Presidio Historic Association mobilized a neighborhood turnout against the project - including posting talking points for opponents on the association’s Web site.

There was also some criticism from unexpected sources - such as Margaret Brodkin, the mayor’s own director of the Department of Children, Youth and Their Families. Despite having declared her support for Fisher’s museum, she dispatched a staffer to the meeting to raise concerns about its effect on a nearby day-care center.

For all the public hoo-rah Monday, the museum would sit on federally controlled land - and Fisher’s real battle may rest with the National Park Service and the National Trust for Historic Preservation. The latter is warning that the building’s size, location and design would have “adverse effects” on the park.

–Doug Kern

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Don Fisher, Wealthy Guy

Don Fisher has lots of money. He gives a fair amount away to charities of his choice. We appreciate his many contributions to education and the arts. We acknowledge his service on the Presidio Trust Board of Directors from 1996 to 2004.

I don’t know Don Fisher personally, but I know many who do. Some have good things to say about his philanthropy. Others, not so much. What comes out consistently is that he’s got a personal and political agenda and since he has money, he works that money into the political landscape to get what he wants. No secrets there.

He probably doesn’t care one way or the other what I personally think about his Presidio museum proposal. But he should. In a democracy, and in the national parks which we all own equally, all of our voices matter, money or not.

It is troubling that he is willing to propose a project that radically alters the vision for the Main Post in the Presidio Trust Management Plan (PTMP), a plan that contains numerous agreements reached after years of discussion with the public, a plan that was completed in 2002 while he was an active member of the Trust Board of Directors. I guess Mr. Fisher believes that one wealthy individual can radically and irrevocably alter the community and agency plans for the Presidio Main Post, a key, defining area of an historic national park, if he has his own plans that better suit his own agenda.

An argument is made by project proponents that this is a marvelous collection of modern art and an incredible gift to the people of San Francisco. No doubt. But “the gift” comes in a great big box, the size of a typical Walmart.  Obviously, this “gift box” doesn’t have to be on the Presidio’s Main Post, destroy artifacts and mangle a National Historic Landmark District in order for all of us to enjoy the Fisher collection’s many virtues.

Here’s what Mr. Fisher has to say about showing his art at the Presidio. He doesn’t seem too concerned about the impacts his “gift” and “gift box” will have on the National Historic Landmark District.

If you want to show your own art… otherwise what do you do with it? You got to sell it, or give it away and people leave it in the basement. And… I don’t want to have our art in the basement. (Chuckle) And so this is ah… this is a way ah… this is a way of… avoiding that.

–Don Fisher

Clearly, the museum should be built in a place without permanently damaging irretrievable resources where traffic and public transportation will give it easy access. But, it appears that things didn’t work out with SFMOMA when he went there first with his proposal. It seems the SFMOMA folks didn’t want to display his very large collection all at one time and give Mr. Fisher the kind of control he wanted over displaying the collection. The “gift” had strings attached. No surprise there.

When Don Fisher’s project with SFMOMA didn’t work out he went to the Presidio Trust and offered to assist with other projects he knew the Trust wanted, such as “greening” the Main Post ($10 million) and rehabilitating one of the Montgomery Street Barracks ($15 million.) Despite having to proceed with a disruptive and distracting set of processes to review the new Fisher proposal, all that money was an offer the Trust couldn’t refuse, even if it meant jeopardizing the Presidio’s National Historic Landmark District designation and burning the community goodwill carefully nurtured by Craig Middleton since becoming the Trust’s Executive Director.

The following comments related to the Contemporary Art Museum at the Presidio, are from Don Fisher, himself. See the video. Decide for yourself if he’s at all concerned about the Presidio or if it’s all about Don Fisher and his art collection. What does Mr. Fisher have to say about the name of his museum and how that ties into the Presidio?

History?  No.  Archeology?  No.  Scenic beauty, surely!  No. (Drumroll, please.)  He ties his museum to the Presidio as a campground!

In fact, the name of the museum is CAMP, Contemporary Art Museum at the Presidio, and that really ties into the Presidio itself, as a campground. (smiling)

–Don Fisher

On Mr. Fisher’s choice of art. He’s knows best, of course, but if you don’t like it, tough.

If we like it and nobody else likes it, well, that’s fine. But we’ve done a pretty good job I think, of ah, of collecting what, ah, is of interest to other people as well.

–Don Fisher

But that goes directly to the point at hand: a wealthy guy saying he knows what’s in our best interest. Destroy the vision. Destroy the landmark status. Destroy the artifacts. Take my gift (with strings, of course.) Because, I know what’s best for you.

The following observations were made on Don Fisher’s philanthropy in an article in SF Weekly on June 21, 2006, unrelated to the current museum proposal (emphasis is mine. –ed.):

I’d be loath to tell a billionaire to stop donating to a charitable cause he sincerely believes will improve the lives of the least fortunate. But we haven’t really thought out what happens when we give up our democratic powers to a growing army of ideological philanthropists.

That said, there are ways to resist this trajectory. Every time a candidate, ballot measure, or lobbying front group is the beneficiary of large donations from ideologically motivated tycoons, voters get the option of accepting this trend as unavoidable and maybe even beneficial. (Or they can resist the urge to support these well-funded candidates and measures, and reject the view that the Donald Fishers of the world should determine everyone’s best interest.)

Fisher’s own example and advice might be useful for those who believe citizen control of the public realm is worth fighting for.

“I don’t think we can sit back and wait for someone else to take the lead, just so we don’t have to expend energy or money,” Fisher writes. “We’ve got to utilize the recourse it takes to advance our causes and hold up our part of the deal.”

Citizen control of the public realm is worth fighting for. Hey, Mr. Fisher, wealthy guy! We’re not sitting back and we never have. We recognize the self-interested basis for your actions and reject that you know or should determine what’s best for the rest of us in our national park. We utilize the recourse it takes to advance our cause. And yes, we continue to hold up our part of the deal. 

–Doug Kern

 

Tags: , , ,